Anti-Gay Tolerance – A Definition

Posted by admin on November 22, 2008 under Funny Things Believed and Said by the Uniformed, Ummm - Your Intolerance is Showing! | Be the First to Comment

I sent a someone an article on some truly despicable things that were being done by a gay and lesbian group in the name of “tolerance.” I heard tell that this person thought that the article was “creepy.” This person obviously did not read the article, because the article was not was not what was so ”creepy.” No, what is “creepy” is what these groups are doing, and the fact that Barack Obama vows undying support to them and their cause.

My clueless friend responded with:

“… I was extremely offended by the anti-gay tolerance e-mail. From the beginning I said that I respected your opinions and thoughts, however the e-mail about anti gay tolerance crossed the line…”

What is “anti-gay tolerance?” This is a new term for me. In reading the English used, the definition would be “tolerating anti-gay sentiment or rhetoric,” at least as far as my knowledge of language goes. Now, if you had said to me: “Because of my anti-gay tolerance, I will dismiss the fact that what you sent offended me,” THAT would make sense, because IF it is true that I am anti-gay, and my friend is the one who excercises tolerance, then this person, as logic indicates, would then be an exemplar model for tolerance. Do I have that right?

But there is one critical flaw in this reason for this person being offended. I am not now, nor have I ever been “anti-gay.” Though I disagree with their lifestyle, they are free to choose their lifestyle, just as I am free to choose mine. No, for me the tipping point – the real line that is crossed – is when they infiltrate the public school system with their radical agenda and propaganda touting their lifestyle disguised as lessons in tolerance.

But many will not get that, because many will not read the article for fear of being unable to tolerate the intolerable. The article goes on to say:

“…One of the teachers asked the assembled students what “fisting” meant. Following a descriptive definition, another of the adult presenters proceeded to demonstrate the proper formation of the hand for this sexual act. After a student of about 16 said that it didn’t sound very appealing, the third adult presenter calmed his concerns. This technique, she explained, “often gets a really bad rap,” and that it was “an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with.” Other homosexual acts were discussed and described in detail.”

NOW THAT IS “CREEPY!” I would venture a guess that approximately 98% of all Americans would agree. Barack Obama is in the wretched 2%.

And so now a culture that bans Bibles in the public school allows the promotion of “fisting.”

And my friend remains clueless.